Student Association representatives from the University of the South Pacific and the University of Fiji have raised concerns over the proposed Constitutional Amendment Bill that has a section on moderate chastisement of children for the purposes of correction.
They say while parents and teachers have a responsibility to guide children and maintain discipline, any form of physical punishment must be carefully considered because of its possible effects on children's confidence, learning and well-being.
University of the South Pacific Students Association President Adi Cama says the proposed amendment needs to be considered carefully, particularly the meaning and application of the term “moderate chastisement”.
Cama says parents and teachers have a responsibility to guide and correct children, but discipline should respect the dignity, safety and wellbeing of the child.
USPSA says if the amendment becomes law, there should be clear definitions, safeguards and proper guidance for parents and teachers.
The University of Fiji Students Association President Rodney Vakaloloma also says he does not support physical violence against children as a form of correction or discipline.
Vakaloloma says the student perspective should also be considered through documents such as the Law 205 Constitution and the Constitution draft prepared by students.
He has advised people to refer to the student Constitution draft, which raises and reflects the views of students on constitutional matters.
Meanwhile a medical student who wishes to remain anonymous says that he does not support physical punishment, saying there are other measures that can be used to maintain discipline among children.
The student also raised concerns about the possible impact of physical punishment on students' schoolwork, confidence and participation in the classroom.
He says children could become afraid to ask questions or speak openly in the classroom if they fear being physically punished.
The students associations' representatives say the views of students and young people should be considered as discussions continue on the proposed constitution amendments.
